Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

#5 - Purdue (30-7)


2 seed, Sweet Sixteen

Matt PainterBig Ten Conference (15-3)

Tourney ResultsTeamcastTeam History

Similar ResumésSimilar Efficiency Profiles


Trend Stat:

Start game No.: | End game No:


Team Stats

Vs: | Venue:
Category Offense Defense Barthag
Adj. Eff. 125.0 3 94.0 22 .9490 5
eFG% 57.7 6 47.0 19
TO% 15.8 30 17.7 220
OR% 28.0 197 28.0 144
FTR 35.6 106 24.2 8
Shooting Stats
3P% 42.0 2 33.2 67
2P% 54.1 40 45.5 22
FT% 74.3 66 68.9 43
Stylistic Stats
3P Rate 40.1 101 34.4 75
Ast. Rate 57.9 48 48.8 83
Adj. Tempo 68.7207

Fun Stuff

Category Offense Defense Barthag
Qual. Eff. 125.1 5 95.7 78 .9394 7
Last 10 Eff. 125 6 99.7 84 .9100 18
Close Games 7-5 (.583) 104
Qual. Games 9-6 (.600) 11
(Expected) Strength of Schedule
Non-con Overall
Elite L% 22 % 49 32 % 32
Basic 0.5496 50 0.7098 30
Current 0.5496 50 0.7098 30
Committee Resumé Metrics
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Pre-Tourney 6-5 5-1 7-0 10-0

Schedule / Results

Offense Defense
Date Opponent Result/Line Record AdjO AdjD PPP eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P PPP eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P G-Sc +/-
11-10 H 14 311 (IV) SIU Edwardsville W, 105-74 76 1-0 126.3 105.9 138.6 66.4 14.5 42.9 52.5 27-42 9-19 97.7 44.4 21.1 47.1 8.6 21-50 10-31 86 16.3
11-12 H 15 345 (IV) Chicago St. W, 111-42 78 2-0 122.4 60.7 142.0 69.7 17.9 48.3 42.4 28-38 12-28 53.7 23.1 17.9 21.2 29.2 12-44 2-21 100 34.8
11-14 A 11 52 (I) Marquette W, 86-71 70 3-0 125.2 86.0 122.4 60.7 15.7 29.2 41.1 28-44 4-12 101.0 50.0 15.7 18.2 28.1 12-30 11-27 98 5.7
11-18 H 10 210 (IV) Fairfield W, 106-64 79 4-0 130.1 84.8 134.0 64.2 11.4 32.4 23.0 19-43 19-31 80.9 49.2 27.8 23.1 21.7 13-30 11-30 99 28
11-22 N 8 12 (I) Tennessee L, 78-75 OT80 4-1 107.9 88.0 94.0 45.8 22.6 25.0 42.4 12-32 10-27 97.8 41.9 18.8 39.2 15.0 20-57 9-23 89 1.2
11-23 N 10 54 (I) Western Kentucky L, 77-73 69 4-2 111.2 100.8 105.9 47.5 18.9 30.6 33.9 16-32 8-27 111.7 55.5 17.4 33.3 43.6 23-43 5-12 73 -6.3
11-24 N 15 27 (I) Arizona W, 89-64 69 5-2 136.1 80.8 128.5 67.6 20.2 30.8 38.9 20-32 11-22 92.4 44.9 15.9 23.7 27.1 22-42 3-17 100 14.2
11-28 H 9 32 (II) Louisville W, 66-57 73 6-2 97.3 72.3 89.9 37.7 15.0 23.1 56.1 14-34 5-23 77.6 36.5 19.1 26.8 22.2 14-45 6-18 95 -1
12-01 A 8 36 (I) Maryland W, 80-75 66 7-2 (1-0) 133.0 102.0 121.8 59.4 13.7 22.2 35.8 18-33 9-20 114.2 42.9 10.7 36.4 41.3 12-35 10-28 94 6.7
12-03 H 7 77 (IV) Northwestern W, 74-69 62 8-2 (2-0) 124.9 107.6 119.6 54.7 11.3 30.3 45.3 20-35 6-18 111.5 52.4 11.3 30.3 7.9 24-43 6-20 82 2.3
12-07 H 8 147 (IV) Valparaiso W, 80-50 74 9-2 110.6 69.7 108.0 50.8 12.2 22.2 38.7 21-41 7-21 67.5 35.8 24.3 23.8 20.0 17-44 3-16 99 15.6
12-10 H 5 277 (IV) IUPUI W, 86-61 70 10-2 116.0 94.7 122.6 61.4 18.5 28.0 29.8 23-31 8-26 87.0 49.1 25.7 25.8 20.4 16-33 7-21 89 11.8
12-16 N 5 20 (I) Butler W, 82-67 73 11-2 124.1 81.4 112.2 61.8 24.6 26.9 47.1 18-30 9-21 91.7 42.8 23.3 42.9 14.5 19-47 7-22 99 13.4
12-21 H 6 204 (IV) Tennessee St. W, 97-48 69 12-2 143.2 76.2 140.5 71.6 13.0 25.9 37.9 19-32 15-26 69.5 38.8 24.6 16.2 32.7 7-24 8-25 100 24.9
12-30 H 4 176 (III) Lipscomb W, 98-66 73 13-2 134.5 93.8 134.6 61.2 15.1 41.7 32.8 23-40 12-27 90.7 46.8 15.1 19.0 24.2 14-37 10-25 98 11.1
01-03 H 3 120 (IV) Rutgers W, 82-51 72 14-2 (3-0) 124.4 75.6 114.0 58.5 22.2 34.4 52.8 16-30 10-23 70.9 35.0 15.3 15.0 26.7 18-47 2-13 99 15.9
01-06 H 3 58 (II) Nebraska W, 74-62 72 15-2 (4-0) 110.3 81.9 102.7 49.2 22.2 34.3 29.5 21-40 6-21 86.0 46.3 22.2 20.6 29.6 16-37 6-17 96 10.5
01-09 A 3 7 (I) Michigan W, 70-69 61 16-2 (5-0) 137.0 100.1 115.2 57.9 13.2 24.2 12.3 15-36 12-21 113.5 53.4 14.8 34.4 19.0 16-36 10-22 96 4.9
01-13 A 2 112 (III) Minnesota W, 81-47 66 17-2 (6-0) 126.6 67.1 121.8 59.0 16.5 31.3 16.4 15-26 14-35 70.7 32.2 13.5 16.3 18.6 13-38 4-21 100 15.6
01-16 H 1 63 (III) Wisconsin W, 78-50 65 18-2 (7-0) 126.9 73.3 119.6 63.8 13.8 20.0 17.2 16-36 14-22 76.7 41.7 30.7 29.0 25.0 11-29 6-19 100 18.2
01-20 A 1 84 (III) Iowa W, 87-64 63 19-2 (8-0) 136.9 88.7 137.4 72.9 17.4 29.6 6.8 13-26 20-33 101.1 49.2 17.4 37.1 20.3 20-41 6-18 99 22.1
01-25 H 1 7 (I) Michigan W, 92-88 65 20-2 (9-0) 163.5 122.5 141.3 73.0 15.4 23.8 46.0 20-30 11-20 135.2 71.6 16.9 36.0 15.5 22-35 13-23 95 2.1
01-28 A 2 67 (II) Indiana W, 74-67 64 21-2 (10-0) 125.5 97.3 115.1 52.7 10.9 23.3 32.1 22-38 5-18 104.2 52.8 15.5 25.8 31.5 24-38 3-16 93 -1
01-31 H 2 36 (II) Maryland W, 75-67 65 22-2 (11-0) 122.5 94.7 115.3 50.9 6.2 26.5 39.7 19-36 7-22 103.0 51.9 21.5 25.8 28.3 17-30 7-23 93 8.6
02-03 A 2 120 (III) Rutgers W, 78-76 65 23-2 (12-0) 134.2 120.8 119.5 52.0 12.3 24.1 56.9 16-30 7-21 116.5 53.1 16.9 45.5 15.6 25-52 6-12 75 6.8
02-07 H 2 15 (I) Ohio St. L, 64-63 66 23-3 (12-1) 105.0 86.9 95.0 51.1 18.1 7.4 40.4 12-27 8-20 96.5 47.4 12.1 17.6 28.1 18-39 6-18 87 3.8
02-10 A 3 6 (I) Michigan St. L, 68-65 63 23-4 (12-2) 117.9 91.0 102.7 45.3 4.7 20.5 15.6 20-45 6-19 107.4 53.3 9.5 18.8 10.0 23-42 6-18 93 3.2
02-15 A 3 63 (II) Wisconsin L, 57-53 64 23-5 (12-3) 90.0 82.4 82.4 43.8 20.2 12.1 35.4 15-31 4-17 88.7 43.1 14.0 16.2 39.2 16-30 4-21 71 1
02-18 H 4 19 (III) Penn St. W, 76-73 66 24-5 (13-3) 127.6 100.7 115.2 55.7 13.6 27.3 50.9 19-33 7-20 110.6 58.0 22.7 36.7 23.2 19-38 9-18 92 1.3
02-22 A 5 87 (III) Illinois W, 93-86 70 25-5 (14-3) 139.4 113.9 133.4 69.8 18.6 31.6 64.6 17-25 11-23 123.3 59.1 8.6 20.6 15.2 21-38 12-28 89 4.3
02-25 H 5 112 (IV) Minnesota W, 84-60 64 26-5 (15-3) 132.8 91.6 131.3 61.3 7.8 30.0 19.4 20-37 12-25 93.8 46.5 20.3 31.4 19.3 16-39 7-18 98 14.8
Big Ten Conference Tournament
03-02 N 5 120 (IV) Rutgers W, 82-75 64 27-5 142.1 123.6 128.4 67.0 14.1 24.0 42.0 14-20 13-30 117.4 50.7 14.1 43.6 14.7 27-54 5-14 81 0.1
03-03 N 5 19 (II) Penn St. W, 78-70 64 28-5 136.7 98.0 121.6 63.0 17.2 25.9 44.0 15-29 11-21 109.1 40.7 12.5 39.0 45.8 12-37 8-22 97 5.2
03-04 N 5 7 (I) Michigan L, 75-66 64 28-6 121.0 104.8 103.2 49.1 17.2 32.3 30.9 21-38 4-17 117.2 57.7 7.8 15.2 48.1 18-29 8-23 81 -7.2
NCAA Tournament
03-16 N 5 172 (III) Cal St. Fullerton W, 74-48 69 29-6 109.0 71.0 106.9 46.6 13.0 29.3 45.8 14-37 9-22 69.4 40.0 24.6 13.5 32.0 14-32 4-18 99 12.3
03-18 N 5 20 (I) Butler W, 76-73 60 30-6 139.9 107.8 126.5 60.6 16.6 36.7 34.6 15-28 11-24 121.5 54.5 13.3 32.1 25.5 21-35 6-20 94 1.1
03-23 N 5 11 (I) Texas Tech L, 78-65 68 30-7 110.8 103.5 95.3 50.9 24.9 28.1 10.3 19-40 7-18 114.4 51.7 16.1 34.4 30.5 23-42 5-17 67 -2.2
Date Opponent Result/Line Record Adj. O Adj. D PPP eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P PPP eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P 3P G-Sc +/-

Purdue Player Stats

Player Gms Min% PRPG! ORtg Usage eFG% TS% OR% DR% Ast% TO% Blk% Stl% FC/40 FTR FTM-FTA FT% 2PM-2PA 2P% 3PM-3PA 3P%
Carsen Edwards
#3, 6-1, So
37 73.7 4.9 117.3 28.6 55.5 59.6 1.5 12.9 19.5 12.0 0.8 2.3 2.4 31.8 131-159 .824 132-261 .506 97-239 .406
Dakota Mathias
#31, 6-4, Sr
37 78.2 4.7 125.3 17.9 62.2 64.1 0.6 13.7 22.2 15.2 0.8 2.3 2.2 17.8 47-57 .825 55-114 .482 96-206 .466
Vincent Edwards
#12, 6-8, Sr
35 74.5 4.5 116.6 24.1 54.4 58.7 8.4 18.6 17.1 15.6 2.0 1.0 2.2 31.7 100-120 .833 129-250 .516 51-128 .398
Isaac Haas
#44, 7-2, Sr
35 55.1 4 120.3 27.4 61.7 65.9 9.6 18.9 6.8 15.2 5.8 0.4 4.2 63.3 144-190 .758 185-300 .617 0-0 .000
P.J. Thompson
#11, 5-10, Sr
37 69.4 3.7 128.0 12.0 63.1 66.9 2.1 5.2 10.4 15.2 0.2 2.5 2.7 36.4 54-64 .844 21-40 .525 60-136 .441
Ryan Cline
#14, 6-5, Jr
37 43.1 1.6 117.3 12.3 55.0 55.7 0.6 10.4 16.0 14.2 0.3 1.2 2.2 4.7 5-6 .833 11-28 .393 40-101 .396
Matt Haarms
#32, 7-3, Fr
37 42.7 1.3 108.8 15.2 58.9 58.6 7.2 14.3 6.2 18.3 12.8 1.0 5.9 48.0 32-59 .542 71-116 .612 1-7 .143
Grady Eifert
#24, 6-6, Jr
36 20.2 1.1 130.3 10.6 66.7 64.2 8.3 15.0 10.1 14.7 0.3 1.2 3.3 72.7 13-24 .542 19-28 .679 2-5 .400
Nojel Eastern
#20, 6-6, Fr
37 31.4 0.4 93.2 18.8 50.0 48.7 10.3 13.1 13.8 26.8 1.1 2.6 4.9 55.2 20-48 .417 39-78 .500 3-9 .333
Benchwarmers (fewer than 10% minutes played)
Jacquil Taylor
#23, 6-10, Jr
19 7.7 0.1 92.9 18.8 46.9 48.9 6.8 19.0 4.5 19.0 6.3 2.0 4.5 25.0 5-8 .625 12-27 .444 2-5 .400
Tommy Luce
#15, 5-10, So
13 2.4 0 69.2 35.1 30.0 32.6 7.5 3.1 37.5 33.4 0.0 3.4 6.9 80.0 3-8 .375 3-9 .333 0-1 .000
Eden Ewing
#5, 6-8, Jr
6 1.8 -0.1 82.3 20.3 50.0 45.9 0.0 12.2 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 8.9 44.4 1-4 .250 3-6 .500 1-3 .333

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.