Click Here or Go Landscape for Full Site Layout

Team:
Conf: State:
By Conf By Coach
Start: End:
vs. Top: or
Venue: | Type:
Min. Games:
Show:

2023 Customizable T-Rank and Tempo-Free Stats


D-I Avg:

101.8

0.497
Eff. FG%
50
Turnover%
19.1
Rebound%
28.9
FT Rate
31.3
2-Pt %
49.8
3-Pt %
33.4

67.9
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag EFG% EFGD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB
108 Middle Tennessee CUSA 7 6-3
1–0
101.4
193
95.5
60
.6659
108
49.6
182
51
212
21.4
295
24.9
18
33
70
22.4
21
38.2
49
36.1
270
53.3
79
50.9
211
28.9
314
34.1
207
67.6
200
-1.6
149
137 Hofstra
   (A) 5 Purdue
CAA 9 6-3
0–0
106.3
79
103.5
214
.5754
137
52.7
91
50.5
192
16.7
58
17.2
258
19.9
351
31
251
27.5
257
20.1
16
51.3
138
49.3
166
36.5
80
35.2
243
69
120
-0.3
84
Rk Team Conf G Rec AdjOE AdjDE Barthag Efg% EfgD% TOR TORD ORB DRB FTR FTRD 2P% 2P%D 3P% 3P%D Adj T. WAB

Play-by-Play splits

Dunks Close Twos Farther Twos Threes
Dunks Close Twos Far Twos Threes
Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense Offense Defense
O% D% O% D% O% D% O% D%
FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share FG% Share
1 Hofstra CAA33.311001007.549.433.756.856.841.353.72636.736.724.636.540.335.235.234.1
2 Middle Tennessee CUSA92.911.793.893.87.162.842.961.661.639.532.919.934.134.125.228.937.234.134.135.2

Trends

(If these fail to load, try refreshing)

;

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.
Quadrant filter based on NCAA thresholds and estimated Selection Sunday NET rank